Philosophy of Coding

 

Philosophy of Coding

1 + 1 = 14

The algorithm of Holy Numbers. Saying that 3 + 9 = 39 is incorect, it goes back to the beginning of mathmateical laws as a mistake in reasonning. a Child like forgiveness is the right thing to do in most of this type of mistakes. On the otherside 3 + 9 = 39 is the algorithm of the beginning of the number sequence, in clear example probably obvious such as 1 + 1 = (11) it indicates the flow of the sequence in the algorithm of the mathmatical law or authoriterian conclusion in the sequence of the algorithm. 

The algorthim of time 

14 is the answer, 1 = X, 1 = Y. The answer is already 14 but how would we tell the computer what 1 indicates in such a simplistic excercise of algorithm creation? How would we program the machine to understand a diffeent answer in the lawes of maths. Also, how would we tell the computer the the same number is to different laws of the same code that interacts differently. The code challenge befroe you have alphabets which goes downward, the letters sequence in an algorithm and law which is created to be broken or bypassed by the turn of the algorithm. The time aspect is taken in to consideration as the clock's numbers in a time that cannot be calcualated. All we know is that the answer is 14 and that 1 = (string of words) and 1 = (numbers in a sequence).

Hacking and ethics 

Many websites are dillberately placed in areas where the crawlers cannot find them, when the seo is created in a deliberate on and off switch. Most of this knowlegde is a fast paces compitition for information that is easy to find, to find information that is rare becomes a difficult almost impossible procedure that opens and closes in the life of every google user. Maybe a different search engine produces different results? That is for the student of SEO to find. Hacking in ethical manners produces a great liberation in coding community. To be good at finding information in the criptic reality of the web produces a new competitive structure. The Algorithm of time is the heart of this argument. The code challnges brings forth an authority of the challenge set before you. The easiest and moost difficult is to find the voice of the creator. This is often bypassed by certain code challneges yet produces a new challenge, the actual code to similate the correct result. The authoriterian concept is a natural occurance in all science. Most scientific experiments are observed by the results outcome. Meaing in depth that the experiment is taken out of a certain flow of thought and conducted thru a safe place of silence.

Hello world!

 It is a constructive criticism in the science comunity that the experiments are not on the same level of openess as the web developing science, or computer science. To conduct the experiment open to the whole world is ethical hacking in it's purist form, to becomes an ethical hacker in truth is to pass thru the medical station as a web developer and open their local host server for the entire world to see the answer to the question about the testing of the vaccines and other medicine on bloodtypes that is pure in animals, adult human and certainly also children. The question is alsways met with a door that closes in the world of green peace and anti-cruelty to animals and children. The method of transport to this type of facility is a second away from the insanity of the question's anser in connection to the vaccines that would be answered more clearly on the pages of the people that are hurt and animals that are in danger of their spirit, soul and life in the kingdom of God.